|
Creative
Disruption and Destructive Disruption of Product Life Cycles
One first must spend a few
minutes getting a big picture overview of product life
cycles to then understand what drives the changes, the business
growth or decline
found in each stage, and most importantly know where you are in your
market

For technology companies
Geoffrey Moore's concept of a technology adoption and life cycle is
a some great thinking. The "Chasm" got all the attention
because is where so many companies fail. These business
models often take huge venture capital money that they never get and
they just go away.

With product based business
you normally have no choice but to start small. It is probably
even more difficult to get capital as a product based business but
it is often not needed in the "start small and grow my business"
world.
With the reference of product
life cycles in mind I have taken my entrepreneurial experience and
updated it to reflect the key aspects of what I see as see happening
at each stage of a product life cycle. The Wiki has a great
entry on this topic at
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Product_life_cycle_management but
they leave out innovation.
The key "take away" here is
that innovation follows the curve as well, if not better, than any
other measure.
I entered the wakeboard tower
market as an enthusiast and early adopter and sold the company, what
I now know, was at the end of the main stream market. I
entered the awning market 10 years ago into 100 year old laggard
market but our innovation and pricing has been in line with this
stage. We entered the T-Top market late stage and have
seen every aspect follow the product life cycle as I have seen it.
We have been the only innovator for almost 2 years and rapidly see a
laggards market with Chinese companies now directly entering our
markets. This has already accelerated the wakeboard tower
market from main stream to laggards in only a few years.
Creative Disruption
When I entered the awning
market we had nothing here, we are playing by the laggards rules.
For Monster Tower in the wakeboard tower market we were the perfect
example of creative disruption of a market. Everything was
custom that was worth owning. Anything universal was junk and
ANYTHING universal had a stigma of not worth owning.
Everything custom was 2-4 months away from delivery and that demand
was growing even with insane prices. We solved a lot of
problems for a lot of wakeboarders and boat dealers through a great
team of wakeboarders and enthusiasts and engineers and we innovated
like mad as were so many others. We innovated amazing
new products. Everybody was bringing crazy cool new products
to market and companies like Boss, Mako, Skylon, Titan, Fluid
Concepts, Bare West, Fusion, etc and us were all creating and
innovation with a passion for competition. SurfExpo, our
annual trade show, had 10 or more companies showing off the latest
new product of theirs every year with impressive booths.
Fishmaster brought new innovation to the fishing products market
with companies like Atlantic, Birdsall and Taco, and others but we
are in a very late stage market.
and Destructive
Disruption
Still got nothing in the
awning market, late laggard stage market. Wakeboard towers
have become a commodity with China based LT Wakeboard setting up
shop in CA as Aerial Wakeboarding following DIYwake.com and others.
Two or three other legacy Asian companies are doing a really good
job have set up shop here to a lesser degree. All have quickly
moved the tower market from main stream to laggard and innovation
has come to a standstill. Patents and trademarks
are being blatantly trampled over. Business ethics become
secondary in this aggressive phase.
The pricing wars in the
market get markedly more noticeable in the "off season" as vendors
trade inventory for cash flow. Most of the innovators
are now out of business and there is little innovation in the
market. There was not one tower company at "our" annual trade
show this year.
For Fishmaster new
competitors from the far east are posing both challenges and
opportunities. We now quickly enter the laggard phase and
logistics, factories and pricing become key. Business ethics
become secondary to market position.
As long as you understand
where you are in the product life cycle there will always be a way
to take advantage of the opportunities that are presented. It
does get uglier as you move to the the last stages but if you know
how to play the game well you can certainly have a lot of fun along
the way.
BB
|